Page 82 - navstrat
P. 82

NAVSTRAT-2030     NAVSTRAT-2030

    Regional Deployment  –  This represents  our forward  presence  in response to
 collective security challenges securing global commons in support of freedom of   led approach to capability development as most effective. This is effective in terms of achieving
 navigation and rules based good order at sea whilst advancing our MDA.  the desired end-state and also from a resources perspective.

                   This shall be short of ‘Force Modernization’ but rooted in the ideal of striking the right balance in
 Above  current deployments  of our  naval  assets  in areas  as  illustrated  in  Figure 11.1 affirms   generating  credible  defence, deterrence  and crisis response capabilities and capacities  whilst
 achievement of SLN’s aspiration to become a credible regional naval force. Thus, our strategy and   actively engaging in our national, regional and global commitments. The effort is to be defined as
 conceptualization is driven through this overarching concept.   a declarative strategy; our envisioned operational orientation and force structure creating effects

                   for a desired future.
 Figure 11.1       We need to elevate Sri Lanka’s maritime profile. The SLN and SLCG over the years have been

 Sea Areas of Interest for Naval Deployment   regarded as proven instruments of maritime power. The SLN and SLCG are subordinate state
                   institutions integrated with other agencies and maritime stakeholders as well as laws and policies.
                   NAVSTRAT-2030 is no substitute to a ‘Maritime Strategy’. However, this could be understood
                   as a nudge towards making the polity appreciate the requirement for a comprehensive strategic
                   guidance/document for the maritime environment. Thus, it is imperative that the formulation of
                   such  is  not  made in isolation  but through  wider  consultation.  It  is  vital to comprehend that
                   strategy is subordinate to policy and different from plans. Plans are problem-solving processes
                   while strategy  is a  problem-defining  process.  We  must  also be aware  of  ‘strategic monism’,
                   prescribing a single concept for all situations. The inclusion of technology should be regarded as
                   an enabler rather than an alternative strategic concept. During the process, we should be mindful
                   not to transform operational concepts to the strategic level.

                   Today,  what transpires  in  the Red  Sea demonstrates  the need  for  ‘forward  defence’  and
                   ‘interoperability’.  It is not too ambitious to think of a concept that would maximize risks and costs
                   for  any  aggression  in our  domain. It is  fundamental that  we  are  committed to  protecting
                   international trade  contributing to  national,  regional  and  global security. In  this,  our  forward
                   employments are to be regarded as confidence building measures in our state’s ability as a credible
                   stakeholder in the Indian Ocean.

                   What are Our Limitations?

                   We  need  to  guard against  overly  ambitious  wishful conceptual  tendencies  for Blue  Water
                   Capabilities, Power Projection, Expeditionary Fleets etc. Ambitions and the envisaged roles must
                   be complementary in the foreseen strategic context and national interests. Failure to do so will
                   create unnecessary inventories, liabilities and increase our vulnerabilities in the long run. Our
                   prime  limitations  are budgetary  support,  industrial capacity, research  and  development,
                   availability of raw materials and recruitment.

 What is NAVSTRAT-2030?
 The NAVSTRAT-2030,  is  to  be weighed  in  its purpose,  scope  and time horizon. Our   What the Strategy will do?
 comprehension of the strategic guidance has prompted to formulate ways to identify the optimum   This should equip the SLN and SLCG to be interoperable with the evolving strategic environment
 ratio  between  available tangible (personnel, forces,  equipment, sensors, platforms,  weapons,   in the region and beyond. It does not alter the focus from defence of our coasts, littoral waters,
 budget, facilities) and intangible (national will, leadership, organization, morale) means in the   ports and critical seabed infrastructure. The strategy will identify whether the Strategic Objectives
 foreseen future to undertake multiple and diverse roles. It shall incorporate at identifying the right   can be accomplished with the available resources or more resources are needed. This endeavour is
 fit between quantity and quality of force posture. Fundamentally, this strategy should be viewed   to provide necessary planning guidance to the subordinate operational and tactical levels. Hence,
 as the new operational orientation in response to the strategic realities of our time and the foreseen   the NAVSTRAT-2030, is not to be regarded as a detailed prescription. Through this, the document
 future especially considering the limitations superimposed by the island’s revenue, consumptions,   ensures to preserve the flexibility, initiative and creative decision making at subordinate levels.
 investments and external trade.   The formulation is to be viewed as a retrospective effort, looking backwards to ensure that means

 An understanding of contemporary maritime/naval strategy development learnt through synthesis   available are sufficient to implement the ways and these concepts can achieve the desired effects
 and analysis of a multitude of maritime nations resulted in the realization of the need for a strategy-   or envisioned objectives.


    68                                                          69
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87